CASE STUDIES # 1
MOTOROLA PROJECT
- Existing recirculation AHU's with 55,000 CFM capacity vane axial fans
were installed in 17'Wx40'L mechanical room.
- The facility was being upgraded to Class 10 level and air flow requirements
is increased to 95,000 cfm.
- The existing filters and coils occupied the full width of the mechanical
room and there was no additional space for adding more surface area.
As such airflow could not be increased above 55,000 cfm.
- There was no space in the existing mechanical room for the additional
auxiliary equipment required to support the new production equipment
being installed.
- M&I Compac Space fan system can provide large volume flow system
in much less footprint than conventional designs.
- Motorola contacted M&I to find a solution to their space problem.
- M&I faced various challenges when designing the system:
a) Inlet Flow Concentrator/Silencer
- Due to the location and dimensions of the supply shaft, the vertical
upflow vane axial fan had to be located only 4 1/2" away from the wall.
This space would not even allow the use of a standard inlet bell for
the fan.
- Due to the limitation in the mechanical room width, the maximum width
of the inlet flow concentrator was limited to 78"x84". The cooling coils
were located only 10.5" from the inlet flow concentrator/silencer.
- Due to limitation in the mechanical room height, the maximum height
of the inlet flow concentrator was limited to 96".
- The overall height and width of the filters/coils were selected to
be much larger than the inlet flow concentrator height and width respectively
in order not to exceed the maximum allowable air velocities across the
filters/coils. The coils/filters were placed asymmetrically on three
sides of the inlet flow concentrator while the fourth side (i.e. the
wall sided) of the inlet flow concentrator was blocked off.
- Air entered the inlet flow concentrator at a velocity of 565 fpm and
accelerated to the fan's annular velocity of 4,880 fpm (at the fan hub)
within 10 1/2" distance from the edge of the inlet flow concentrator
while undergoing a 90 degree turn.
- The inlet flow concentrator, coil/filter support structures and the
fan roll-out rails were all built in multiple segments in order to be
able to bring them into the mechanical room through the existing doors
and corridors.
b) Outlet Silencer
- The outlet silencer was made to match the space between the fan and
the existing rectangular supply duct. The outlet silencer incorporated
the transition plenum from round to rectangular shape.
- The outlet silencer was also built in multiple segments of 32" max.
width in order to be able to bring it into the mechanical room through
the existing doors and corridors.
- With these extreme limitations, M&I was able to achieve the following:
- Increased air flow from 55,000 cfm to 95,000 cfm.
- Achieved uniform air velocity across the filters/coils (less than
5% variance) and turned the air sharply into the fan within a very short
distance without causing any turbulence or flow separation which would
affect the fan performance as well as cause vibration.
- Used only 20' length of the 40' long mechanical room. The remaining
20'Lx17'W space was used to install the auxiliary manufacturing equipment
that Motorola did not have any space for.
- Inlet flow concentrator, which also acts as a silencer, achieved substantial
insertion losses, providing a very quiet operation.
- Outlet silencer gradually reduced the fan's annular velocity pressure
to the duct entry velocity of 1,770 fpm. In the process, 80% of the
fan's annular velocity pressure was regained, thus reducing the fan
static pressure. Furthermore, the inlet flow concentrator had much less
pressure than the existing conventional silencer, reducing the fan static
pressure. This resulted in considerable reduction in the fan BHP.
BENEFITS TO THE CUSTOMER
- They were able to upgrade the facility to Class 10 level from Class
100 since they were able to increase the capacity of recirculation AHU's
to the required flow of 95,000 cfm.
- 340 sft of much needed space was recovered in mechanical room and
put into use.
- Energy consumption of the fans was reduced by 25% due to aerodynamical
design of the Compac Space system. This is a substantial savings since
47% of the heatload in such facilities in contributed by the recirculation
fans.
- The fan in the Compac Space system produced minimal vibration (less
than 0.02 mil) requiring much less servicing than the fans used with
the conventional design in this facility. Furthermore, the Compac space
fan was allowed to be serviced while the fan was running, thus preventing
costly shutdowns in the production area while the fans are being serviced.
- The modular design of the Compac Space system allowed them to bring
the equipment into the mechanical room without necessity of enlarging
doors or corridors. As a result, the installation could be done within
a 24 hour period, which included the removal of the existing 55,000
cfm system, and the production could be started without any downtime.
- Reduced mechanical room, coupled with reduced noise and vibration
in the Compac Space fan, allowed the customer to use the full length of
the clean room space thus adding additional 10 ft length to the production
area.
Conventional System Layout for 55,000
CFM
(Existing System)
Back View - click image for close up

Side View (above) - click image for close up
M & I Compac Space Fan System with 95,000 CFM Capacity
Project: Motorola Inc.
Side View (below) - click image for close up

Front Elevation (bottom) - click image for close up

M & I Compac Space Fan System with 55,000 CFM Capacity
Project: Motorola Inc.
Section A - A Plan View - click image for close up

Section B - B
Plan view At Outlet
Silencer Mounting

TABLE - 1
ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE
Hz W FAN W INLET W FAN CASING W OUTLET TL INLET TL OUTLET
63 92 87 81 85 5 7
125 94 85 79 81 9 13
250 100 85 87 77 15 23
500 98 79 84 70 19 28
1k 96 77 82 71 19 25
2k 92 70 72 68 22 21
4k 86 66 60 65 20 21
8k 80 56 55 68 24 12
TABLE - 2
MEASURED DISPLACEMENT
The peak displacement occurred at the motor RPM. The measured radial displacement
level of the fan casing was 0.018 mils. The axial displacement was less
than the radial one.
Project: Motorola Inc.
BHP CALCULATION FOR M&I COMPAC SPACE FAN SYSTEM
WITH 95,000 CFM CAPACITY UNDER FINAL OPERATING CONDITIONS
Various static pressure losses and BHP calculation for the system under
the final operating conditions (i.e. after removal of the existing coils
and inlet silencer) and at 95,000 cfm flow are as follows:
Prefilters(@565 fpm) : 0.32" WG (From manufacturers' data sheets)
Secondary filters (@565 fpm): 0.43" WG (From manufacturers' data sheets)
Cooling Coil(@565 fpm) : 0.35" WG (From manufacturers' data sheets)
Inlet Silencer : 0.35
Outlet Silencer : 0.15
90 Degree Turn Elbow : 0.10 (Given by Motorola)
Plenum Losses : 0.10 (Given by Motorola)
Room Losses : 0.05 (Given by Motorola)
Duct Losses : 0.05 (Given by Motorola)
Hepa Filter : 0.30 (Given by Motorola)
System Static Pressure : 2.20" WG
Fan's duct velocity pressure: 1.20" WG
Total Pressure = S.P. + V.P. - Regain(*)
= 2.20 + 1.20 - 0.75 = 2.65" WG
Efficiency: 79% (at Fan S.P. of 2.20 - 0.75 = 1.45" WG)
BHP = (95,000 x 2.65)/(6,360 x 0.79) = 50.1 HP
In future, different Case Studies of our various products will be posted
here to show you how well these products perform in a real-world environment.
All case studies are based on actual, installation experiences. |
CASE STUDIES # 2
SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE TESTS
FOR SONY / YBG PROJECT
|
Introduction
|
The tests were conducted to document the performance of the relief fan system
#RF-6 for the Sony Entertainment Centre. The nominal fan specification is 33,000
CFM delivery a 2" WG static pressue. To this end aerodynamic and acoustic measurements
were performed.

Click image for closeup
Aerodynamic Performance
The flow through the unit was measured by means of a survey over discharge.
A calibrated CompuFlow 8575 (hot wire) Anemometer was used for velocity measurement
at 10x30=300 different measurement points of cross section of discharge. The
volume flow was computed by multiply the duct area by the averaged velocity
as measured by the anemometer.
The inlet of unit was covered with steel net and filter to simulated a system
load. The static pressure rise across the fan was measured by means of a calibrated
total and static pressure probe traversed the inlet and discharge of fan. For
accurate static pressure measurement care was taken to align the probes with
the flow by monitoring the total pressure value. The measurement positions and
results are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1.

Click image for closeup
Acoustic Performance
For the acoustical tests, the unit was placed on a 7' high carrier and operated
at 33,200 CFM. Sound emitted from the unit was measured in terms of the acoustic
power, which provides a direct measure of the overall sound energy emitted from
inlet, plenum casing and outlet of unit.
The sound power measurements were made using sound intensity methods as specified
in ANSI Standard S12.12 "Engineering Method for the Determination of Sound Power
Levels of Noise Sources Using Sound Intensity", and in ISO Standard 9614-1 "Acoustics
Determination of Sound Power Levels of Noise Sources Using Sound Intensity".
For the casing radiated sound power measurement, a grid of 15 measurement points
over each of the top and bottom surfaces and 10 points over each of the sides
was used. Since the inlet airflow velocities were low(~500 FPM), a single scan
over the entire inlet opening was used to measure the inlet sound power. At
the outlet, where the flow velocities were higher, four measurement points were
selected at a distance of 1.5 hydraulic diameters from the centre of the outlet
duct termination, at an angle of 45 degrees to the direction of discharge, in
order to keep the sound intensity probe out of the airflow.

Click image for closeup
Acoustical data are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
ACOUSTIC DATA AT 33,200 CFM
Frequency FAN PWL INLET PWL OUTLET PWL Case Radiated
Hz dB dB dB PWL dB
63 92 85 89 63
125 94 88 92 64
250 94 76 91 54
500 95 68 68 53
1k 91 69 60 47
2k 90 70 60 36
|